Multifamily LTV ratios in 2025-2026 range from 65% to 85% depending on the lender type, deal size, property stabilization, and geographic market. Agency lenders like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac still offer the highest leverage for stabilized properties at up to 80%, while HUD/FHA programs can reach 85-87% for qualified borrowers willing to accept longer timelines. Banks, CMBS, and life companies typically cap at 65-75%, and bridge lenders focus on loan-to-cost (LTC) ratios of 75-85% for value-add projects.
This guide breaks down every major lender category, shows how DSCR constraints reduce your effective LTV, and explains what you can do to maximize leverage on your next multifamily acquisition or refinance.
Need Financing for This Project?
Stop searching bank by bank. Get matched with 6,000+ vetted lenders competing for your deal.
What Are the Current Multifamily LTV Ratios by Lender Type?
Multifamily LTV ratios vary significantly across lender types, and choosing the right capital source can mean the difference between a 65% and an 85% loan-to-value ratio. Each lender category has different risk tolerances, regulatory requirements, and underwriting standards that drive their maximum leverage.
Here is how the major lender types compare for stabilized multifamily properties in the current market.
Fannie Mae offers maximum LTV ratios of 80% for standard market-rate multifamily properties and up to 80% for affordable housing deals. Their Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) program remains the most popular execution for stabilized assets above $6 million. Minimum DSCR requirements of 1.25x apply, and most deals in the current rate environment land between 65-75% effective LTV after the DSCR constraint is applied.
Freddie Mac mirrors Fannie Mae's leverage limits with 80% maximum LTV through their Optigo platform. Freddie's Small Balance Loan (SBL) program, available for deals between $1 million and $7.5 million, is particularly competitive for smaller multifamily assets. Their conventional program handles deals from $7.5 million upward.
HUD/FHA remains the highest-leverage option, offering up to 85% LTV through the 223(f) program for acquisitions and refinances, and 87% LTV for properties meeting affordability criteria. The tradeoff is a 6-9 month closing timeline and more extensive documentation requirements.
Banks and credit unions typically cap multifamily LTV at 70-75% for portfolio loans. Regional banks may stretch to 75% for strong sponsors with existing deposit relationships. Their advantage is flexibility on deal structure and faster closing times of 30-45 days.
CMBS lenders offer 65-75% LTV for stabilized multifamily, with most conduit deals landing at 70-72%. CMBS provides non-recourse financing with interest-only options, making it attractive for larger institutional deals. Learn more about conduit loan structures and how they fit into multifamily capital stacks.
Life insurance companies are the most conservative, typically capping at 60-70% LTV. However, they offer the lowest interest rates in the market and prefer long-term, fixed-rate structures on Class A stabilized assets in primary markets.
Bridge lenders focus on loan-to-cost (LTC) rather than LTV, offering 75-85% LTC for value-add and transitional multifamily properties. Day-one LTV on bridge deals typically ranges from 70-80%, with future funding for renovations built into the loan structure.
How Does DSCR Impact Your Effective Multifamily LTV?
DSCR is the single biggest factor that reduces your actual leverage below the advertised maximum LTV. Even though a lender may advertise 80% LTV, the debt service coverage ratio constraint almost always governs the final loan amount in today's interest rate environment.
The DSCR measures whether a property's net operating income (NOI) can cover the annual debt service payments. Most multifamily lenders require a minimum DSCR between 1.20x and 1.35x, depending on the program.
Here is the math behind DSCR-constrained leverage. Take a $10 million multifamily property with $600,000 in NOI. At a 6.5% interest rate with 30-year amortization:
- An 80% LTV loan of $8,000,000 would require annual debt service of roughly $607,000
- That produces a DSCR of only 0.99x, which fails every lender's minimum
- To hit a 1.25x DSCR, the maximum loan drops to approximately $6,350,000, or 63.5% LTV
This is why the concept of "effective LTV" matters far more than the advertised maximum. Use the commercial mortgage calculator to model different scenarios for your specific property.
The DSCR constraint is most binding in higher interest rate environments. When rates were at 3.5% in 2021, a 1.25x DSCR often allowed borrowers to reach the full 80% LTV. At 6.0-6.5% rates in 2025, the DSCR constraint typically limits effective LTV to 63-72% for most deals.
Several strategies can help you improve your DSCR and maximize leverage:
- Increase NOI through rent increases, expense reductions, or adding ancillary income (laundry, parking, pet fees)
- Extend amortization to reduce annual debt service (30-year vs 25-year)
- Negotiate interest-only periods to lower initial debt service requirements
- Choose lower-rate lenders like life companies or agency programs with rate buydowns
- Structure supplemental financing with a senior/mezzanine split
To understand DSCR requirements for multifamily in more detail, review the specific thresholds by lender type.
What Is the Difference Between Agency and Non-Agency Multifamily LTV?
Agency lending (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD/FHA) and non-agency lending (banks, CMBS, life companies, bridge lenders) represent fundamentally different approaches to multifamily leverage. Understanding these differences helps you choose the right capital source for your deal.
Agency lenders offer several structural advantages:
- Higher maximum LTV: 80-87% vs 60-75% for non-agency
- Non-recourse: No personal guarantees required (standard carve-outs apply)
- Fixed rates: Long-term fixed-rate options up to 30 years
- Assumable loans: New buyers can take over existing agency debt
- Supplemental loans: Additional leverage available after 12 months of seasoning
Non-agency lenders compete on different terms:
- Faster closing: 30-45 days vs 45-75 days for agency
- Flexible underwriting: More willingness to work with unique situations
- Interest-only options: CMBS and life companies frequently offer full-term IO
- No mission requirements: No affordable housing overlays or tenant income limits
- Value-add friendly: Bridge and bank lenders fund renovation budgets
For permanent financing on stabilized multifamily, agency loans are typically the best execution. For transitional or value-add deals, non-agency capital is often the only realistic option.
The ideal strategy for many multifamily investors is to acquire and renovate with bridge debt, then refinance into agency permanent financing once the property stabilizes. This bridge-to-agency exit strategy allows you to capture both higher leverage on the back end and renovation funding on the front end.
How Do Multifamily LTV Ratios Vary by Geography?
Geographic market tier significantly impacts the LTV ratio you can expect from any lender type. Primary markets like New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago receive the most favorable leverage, while secondary and tertiary markets face 5-15% LTV reductions depending on the lender.
Agency lenders (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) are the most geographically flexible, maintaining consistent LTV guidelines across most U.S. markets. Their DUS lenders may apply market-specific overlays that reduce effective leverage in smaller markets.
CMBS lenders differentiate more aggressively by geography. A Class A multifamily asset in a top-10 MSA may qualify for 75% LTV, while the same property type in a rural market might be capped at 65% or declined entirely.
Life insurance companies are the most geographically selective, focusing exclusively on primary and strong secondary markets and declining tertiary markets outright.
Bridge lenders show the least geographic discrimination, focusing more on the business plan and sponsor track record than the specific market.
Factors that influence geographic LTV adjustments include:
- Population growth: Markets with positive net migration receive better leverage
- Employment diversity: Single-industry markets face LTV haircuts
- Rent growth trajectory: Declining or flat rents may trigger 5-10% LTV reductions
- Supply pipeline: Excessive new construction lowers available leverage
- Regulatory environment: Rent control markets may receive reduced leverage
What LTV Can You Expect for Value-Add vs Stabilized Multifamily?
The stabilization status of your multifamily property is one of the most important factors in determining available leverage. Stabilized properties with strong occupancy and seasoned cash flow qualify for the highest LTV ratios, while value-add and transitional properties require different loan structures entirely.
Stabilized multifamily properties (90%+ occupancy, 12+ months operating history, no deferred maintenance) qualify for the full range of permanent financing options:
- Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac: 75-80% LTV
- HUD/FHA 223(f): 83-87% LTV
- CMBS: 70-75% LTV
- Life companies: 60-70% LTV
- Banks: 70-75% LTV
Value-add multifamily properties (below-market rents, deferred maintenance, occupancy below 85%, or significant capital expenditure planned) typically cannot qualify for agency or permanent financing. These deals require bridge or transitional lending:
- Bridge lenders: 75-85% LTC (including renovation budget)
- Banks: 70-75% LTC (limited renovation funding)
- Mezzanine/preferred equity: Can push total capitalization to 85-92% LTC when layered with senior bridge debt
The key distinction is that value-add lenders underwrite to the "as-stabilized" value, meaning they consider what the property will be worth after renovations are complete. For value-add deals, the typical capital stack includes senior bridge debt at 75-80% of as-stabilized value, mezzanine or preferred equity at 5-12%, and sponsor equity of 8-20%.
Once renovations are complete, borrowers can refinance into a permanent loan at the new, higher appraised value, often returning a significant portion of original equity.
How Do Small Balance and Large Balance Multifamily LTV Ratios Compare?
Loan size creates meaningful differences in available leverage and lender options. The market generally breaks into three tiers: small balance (under $7.5 million), conventional ($7.5 million to $100 million), and large/institutional ($100 million and above).
Small balance multifamily ($1M-$7.5M) benefits from dedicated programs like Freddie Mac SBL (80% LTV) and Fannie Mae Small Loan (80% LTV for $750K-$6M), plus community banks at 70-75% LTV and CDFI lenders up to 85% LTV for affordable projects.
Conventional multifamily ($7.5M-$100M) accesses the full range of capital sources including Agency (80% LTV), CMBS (65-75%), life companies (60-70%), and bridge (75-85% LTC).
Large institutional multifamily ($100M+) often receives the most competitive terms through agency execution with rate discounts, club deals, custom securitizations, and institutional bridge at 80-85% LTC.
Small balance borrowers often face slightly higher interest rates (25-50 basis points above conventional pricing) but benefit from more streamlined underwriting and faster closing timelines. The Freddie Mac SBL program in particular has simplified documentation requirements that can reduce closing time to 30-45 days.
Larger deals benefit from economies of scale in financing costs. Origination fees, legal expenses, and third-party reports represent a smaller percentage of the total loan amount, improving overall cost of capital.
What Recent Policy Changes Affect Multifamily LTV Ratios?
Several regulatory and policy shifts in 2024-2025 have directly impacted multifamily lending leverage. Staying current on these changes helps borrowers position their deals for maximum leverage.
FHFA Lending Caps: The Federal Housing Finance Agency sets annual lending caps for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The 2025 caps were set at $73 billion each, with additional carve-outs for affordable and mission-driven lending. These caps influence how aggressively the agencies compete for deals throughout the year. When agencies are under their caps, they tend to offer more competitive terms including higher leverage.
Basel III Endgame (Revised): The revised Basel III capital requirements, expected to take effect in phases through 2026, will increase the capital banks must hold against commercial real estate loans. This may lead some banks to reduce multifamily LTV limits or increase pricing to offset higher capital charges.
Interest Rate Environment: The Federal Reserve's monetary policy trajectory directly impacts multifamily LTV through the DSCR constraint. Each 50 basis point reduction in rates can increase effective LTV by 3-5 percentage points for deals governed by DSCR minimums.
Climate Risk Disclosures: Some agency and CMBS lenders have begun incorporating climate risk assessments into underwriting. Properties in flood zones, wildfire-prone areas, or regions with increasing severe weather may face LTV reductions of 5-10% or additional insurance requirements that reduce NOI and DSCR.
Rent Control Expansion: Several states and municipalities have expanded rent control or rent stabilization programs. Properties subject to rent regulation often receive lower LTV ratios because lenders discount future NOI growth potential. In New York City, for example, rent-stabilized multifamily assets typically receive 5-10% lower LTV than market-rate properties.
Get current LTV benchmarks across all commercial property types to compare multifamily leverage against other asset classes.
How Can You Maximize Your Multifamily LTV Ratio?
Maximizing leverage on a multifamily deal requires strategic preparation across multiple dimensions. Here are the most effective tactics that experienced borrowers use to push their LTV higher.
Optimize your NOI before applying. Lenders underwrite based on trailing 12-month financials. Start improving revenue and reducing expenses 12-18 months before you plan to refinance. Even small improvements can meaningfully increase your DSCR and allowable loan amount.
Shop multiple lender types. Different capital sources offer different leverage for the same deal. An agency lender might offer 75% LTV while a bank offers 70% for the identical property. Always get quotes from at least three different lender types.
Consider supplemental financing. Agency loans allow borrowers to add supplemental loans after 12 months of seasoning. This means you can start at 70% LTV, season the property, and add a supplemental loan to push total leverage to 78-80% of the new appraised value.
Structure an interest-only period. Interest-only payments reduce annual debt service, which improves your DSCR and can allow higher leverage. Many agency and CMBS programs offer 2-5 years of interest-only payments.
Pursue affordable housing designations. Properties that qualify as affordable housing under agency guidelines receive higher LTV limits (up to 80% for Fannie/Freddie and 87% for HUD). Income restrictions apply, but the leverage benefit can be substantial.
Build your sponsor resume. Lenders reward experience. Sponsors with a track record of successful multifamily ownership and operations receive better leverage, lower rates, and more favorable terms. First-time multifamily buyers may face 5-10% LTV reductions.
Time your application strategically. Agency lenders become more aggressive on pricing and leverage in Q4 when they need to deploy remaining lending cap allocations. Conversely, Q1 can be more competitive as lenders have fresh capital to deploy.
Ready to explore your multifamily financing options? Schedule a consultation with our team to discuss your specific deal and find the best leverage available.
What Role Does Loan-to-Cost Play in Multifamily Development?
For ground-up multifamily construction and heavy value-add projects, lenders shift from loan-to-value (LTV) to loan-to-cost (LTC) as the primary leverage metric. Understanding LTC ratios is essential for development projects where no stabilized value exists yet.
Construction lenders typically offer 60-75% LTC for multifamily development projects. Agency construction-to-permanent programs offer higher leverage: Fannie Mae up to 80% LTC and HUD 221(d)(4) up to 85% LTC for market-rate (87% for affordable), combining construction and permanent financing into a single loan.
For more on eligible soft costs in agency construction lending, understanding what expenses count toward your total cost basis can help maximize your LTC ratio.
Bridge-to-permanent strategies for value-add multifamily follow a proven path: acquire with bridge debt at 75-80% of purchase price plus renovation budget, complete renovations to stabilized occupancy, then refinance into agency permanent debt at 75-80% of the new appraised value. The cash-out refinance often returns 50-80% of original equity.
This "recycling" of equity is one of the primary strategies professional multifamily investors use to scale their portfolios. By forcing appreciation through renovations and refinancing at higher values, investors can redeploy their equity into the next acquisition.
Contact Clearhouse Lending to discuss your multifamily acquisition, refinance, or development project. Our team can model multiple capital structures and identify the highest-leverage option for your specific deal.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a good LTV ratio for a multifamily loan?
A good LTV ratio for a multifamily loan depends on the lender type and property condition. For stabilized properties, 75-80% LTV through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac is considered strong leverage. HUD/FHA programs can reach 85-87% LTV for qualified borrowers. Most conventional bank and CMBS loans fall in the 65-75% range. The "best" LTV is the one that balances leverage with sustainable debt service coverage, typically maintaining a minimum 1.25x DSCR.
Why is my actual multifamily LTV lower than the lender's maximum?
Your actual (effective) LTV is almost always lower than the advertised maximum because of the DSCR constraint. Lenders calculate the maximum loan amount based on both LTV limits and DSCR minimums, then use whichever produces the lower amount. In today's rate environment (6.0-6.5%), the DSCR constraint typically governs, reducing effective LTV to 63-72% even when the program allows 80%.
Can I get 80% LTV on a multifamily property?
Yes, 80% LTV is achievable through Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and certain HUD programs. However, reaching 80% requires strong property cash flow producing a DSCR above 1.25x at the higher loan amount, stabilized occupancy above 90%, an experienced sponsor, and a market with positive fundamentals. In the current rate environment, hitting 80% is most realistic for properties with above-average cap rates.
How do multifamily LTV ratios compare to other commercial property types?
Multifamily consistently receives the highest LTV ratios among all commercial property types. Agency backing from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which is unique to multifamily, enables 75-80% LTV compared to 65-75% for retail, 60-70% for office, and 65-75% for industrial properties. HUD programs push multifamily leverage even higher to 85-87%. This favorable treatment reflects multifamily's essential nature as housing, lower historical default rates, and government-backed secondary market liquidity.
What credit score do I need for maximum multifamily LTV?
Credit score requirements vary by lender type but are generally less important for multifamily commercial loans than residential mortgages. Agency lenders require a minimum 680 for the key principal, with no meaningful LTV reduction above that threshold. Banks may require 700+ for full leverage. Bridge lenders often accept 660+ with strong deal fundamentals. HUD/FHA programs focus more on financial strength and experience than credit score alone.